House members raised a staggering 80 percent (more than $10 million) of their $100-or-
larger contributions outside their districts. Eighteen House members took more than 95
percent of these contributions from such alien sources. Rep. Senfronia Thompson, raised
an astonishing 100 percent of her money outside of her district.4 Four other members who
raised 99 percent of their major contributions from alien sources are Democratic Reps.
Pete Patterson and Speaker Laney, and Republican Reps. John Culberson and
Talmadge Heflin. While Rep. Patterson’s relative dependence on such money is extreme,
he only raised $12,825.
Dependency On Out-of-District Money
(Contributions of $100 or more)
Most-Dependent Members |
Dist. | Member | Party | % |
141 | Senfronia Thompson | D | 100% |
3 | Pete Patterson | D | 99% |
130 | John Culberson | R | 99% |
149 | Talmadge Heflin | R | 99% |
85 | Pete Laney | D | 99% |
88 | Warren Chisum | R | 98% |
139 | Sylvester Turner | D | 98% |
105 | Dale Tillery | D | 98% |
145 | Diana Davila | D | 97% |
95 | Glenn Lewis | D | 97% |
128 | Fred Bosse | D | 97% |
131 | Ron Wilson | D | 97% |
124 | Christine Hernandez | D | 97% |
116 | Leo Alvarado | D | 96% |
93 | Toby Goodman | R | 96% |
29 | Tom Uher | D | 96% |
96 | Kim Brimer | R | 96% |
150 | Paul J. Hilbert | R | 96% |
|
Least-Dependent Members |
Dist. | Member | Party | % |
14 | Bill Roman | R | 7% |
69 | John Hirschi | D | 9% |
6 | Ted Kamel | R | 33% |
49 | Elliott Naishtat | D | 36% |
27 | Dora Olivo | D | 38% |
57 | Jim Dunnam | D | 41% |
40 | Juan Hinojosa | D | 42% |
108 | Carolyn Galloway | R | 44% |
71 | Bob Hunter | R | 49% |
26 | Charlie Howard | R | 49% |
51 | Glen Maxey | D | 49% |
7 | Tommy Merritt | R | 50% |
140 | Kevin Bailey | R | 53% |
15 | Thomas Williams | R | 54% |
34 | Hugo Berlanga | D | 55% |
92 | Todd Smith | R | 59% |
90 | Lon Burnam | D | 60% |
28 | Robert Cook | D | 60% |
|
Only 11 House members raised more than half of their major campaign contributions in
their districts. Reps. Bill Roman and John Hirschi depended least on alien sources,
taking less than 10 percent of their money from outside of their districts.
Dialing for Dollars:
Where Money Rolls for Pols
|
City | Zip | Amount |
Austin | 78701 | $2,805,815 |
Austin | 78767 | $1,232,353 |
Houston | 77056 | $676,885 |
Austin | 78768 | $330,525 |
Dallas | 75201 | $280,766 |
Austin | 78704 | $232,591 |
Houston | 77002 | $206,586 |
Ft. Worth | 76102 | $157,902 |
Dallas | 75221 | $152,882 |
Total | | $6,076,305 |
|
These alien contributions raise questions about where such money originates. A 1996
study found that 13 Texas Senate Committee Chairs got half of their money from just 25
zip codes.5 The fact that these zip codes are concentrated in a few central business
districts confirms the extent to which PACs and businesses—rather than average
Texans—finance Texas’ political process.
House contributions are even more concentrated. House members reaped $6,076,305
from just nine zip codes; this money accounts for 48 percent of the value of all
contributions of $100 or more.
Although there are 2,618 zip codes in Texas, just three Austin zip codes supplied
$4,368,693 in major contributions, or 35 percent of the value of all major House
contributions. Austin’s two leading zip codes service its law and lobby firms around the
Capitol and its downtown post office boxes. Central business districts and their
corresponding postal boxes also were the hot spots in Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth.
4 None of Rep. Thompson’s itemized contributions were in district, not even those of less than $100.
5 “Money With Interest: Campaign Contributions to the Standing Committee Chairs of the Texas State
Senate,” by Lynn Tran, Center for a New Democracy, Austin, June 1996.
Copyright © 1998 Public Interest Research Groups, Texans for Public Justice