[ Report Home | Previous Page | Next Page ]

Lowering the Bar: Lawyers Keep Texas Appeals Judges on Retainer
 

IV. Who Bankrolls the Justices?

A. Contributions By Donor Size
Major donors of $1,000 or more accounted for 73 percent of the $6.8 million in appeals court contributions studied in this report; mega-donors of $10,000 or more accounted for 24 percent of the total. Most Texas households could not afford to contribute $1,000 to a judicial candidate—even if they wanted to. These large donations fuel perceptions that justice is for sale in Texas.
 
Contributions By Donor Size
Donors Who 
Gave Justices:
 Total Contributions
 Donor Count
  Percent 
  of Total
Less than $500
$1,133,311
7,735
17%
$500 - $999
$723,355
1,284
11%
$1,000 - $4,999
$2,303,025
1,370
34%
$5,000 - $9,999
$1,051,587
174
15%
$10,000 or more
$1,613,180
71
24%
TOTALS:
$6,824,458
10,634
100%
 

 


B. Lawyer Money Dominates
The perceived inequities of this system are compounded further by the fact that donors in the Lawyers & Lobbyists sector gave district appeals justices $4.9 million, or 72 percent of their total campaign funds. With lobbyists and related interests accounting for a negligible $11,682 of this sector’s total, the justices took close to three-fourths of their campaign money from lawyers and law firms—the very donors who have the most recurring interest in the rulings of these courts. The remaining 28 percent of the justices’ money came from non-lawyer individuals (22 percent) and institutional PACs and businesses other than law firms (6 percent).
 
 
 

Lawyer Money Dominates
Donor  Contributions   Percent 
Lawyers & Law Firms
$4,901,913
72%
Individual Non-Lawyer Donors
$1,501,179
22%
Institutional Non-Law Donors
$421,366
6%
TOTALS:
$6,824,458
100%

 
 
1. Dependency On Lawyer Money Is Increasing
Election 
Cycle
Lawyer & Law Firm 
Contributions
 Lawyers & Law Firms 
Share of Total
1996
$300,160
61%
1998
$835,021
66%
2000
$2,499,361
74%
2002
$1,267,370
76%
TOTALS:
$4,901,913
72%

Texas’ district appeals justices increased their dependence on attorney contributions steadily over the four election cycles analyzed in this report. Sitting justices who won office in 1996 obtained 61 percent of their money from lawyers and law firms, while justices just elected in 2002 obtained 76 percent of their campaign money from attorney interests.
 
 

2. Lawyer Dependency By District
District
Share of Money 
Raised From Lawyerss
1-Houston
73%
2-Fort Worth
68%
3-Austin
67%
4-San Antonio
69%
5-Dallas
89%
6-Texarkana
48%
7-Amarillo
70%
8-El Paso
89%
9-Beaumont
67%
10-Waco
41%
11-Eastland
33%
12-Tyler
23%
13-Corpus
88%
14-Houston
87%
TOTAL:
72%

The dependency of the justices on lawyer contributions varied by district, ranging from a high of 89 percent of all money raised in Dallas’ Fifth District and El Paso’s Eighth District to a low of 23 percent in Tyler’s Twelfth District. Generally, larger courts in major metropolitan areas had larger war chests and a greater dependency on lawyer contributions.
 

3. Lawyer Dependency By Party
Party
No. of 
Races Won
 Total Money 
Raised
 Amount of Money 
From Attorneys
Share of 
 MoneyRaised 
 From Lawyers 
Dem.
24
$2,753,729
$2,248,321
82%
Rep.
63
$4,070,729
$2,653,591
65%
TOTAL:
87
$6,824,458
$4,901,912
72%

Democratic justices generally took a much larger share of their campaign money from lawyers than their Republican counterparts. Attorneys accounted for an average of 82 percent of winning Democratic war chests and 65 percent of winning GOP war chests. This may reflect a narrower fundraising base among Democratic judicial candidates as well as the electoral shift that has forced winning Democratic judicial candidates to raise an average of 78 percent more money than their Republican counterparts.
 

4. Lawyer Dependency Rankings of Justices
While the justices took an average of 72 percent of their money from lawyers and law firms, 19 of the 87 campaigns turned to lawyers for at least 90 percent or their money and five incumbent justices with small war chests took all of their money from lawyers.8  Corpus Christi Justice Dori Contreras Garza took 96 percent of her $266,072 from attorneys (with 19 percent coming from the Law offices of Michael Garza and Dori Contreras Garza). Houston Justices Charles Seymore and Scott Brister raised more than $100,000, with attorneys supplying 90 percent of their money.
 

Most Lawyer-Dependent Justices
Justice
Election 
Year
Dist.
Running Status
Amount 
Raised
Share From 
Lawyers
Richard Barajas (D)
1996
8
Incumbent
$4,800
100%
Joseph B. Morris (R)
2000
5
Incumbent
$16,550
100%
James 'Ed' Kinkeade (R)
2000
5
Incumbent
$11,000
100%
Linda B. Thomas (R)
2000
5
Incumbent
$3,500
100%
Mark Whittington (R)
2002
5
Incumbent
$24,500
100%
Molly M. Francis (R)
2002
5
Incumbent
$39,500
99%
Kerry P. Fitzgerald (R)
2002
5
Incumbent
$31,570
99%
Richard H. Edelman (R)
2000
14
Incumbent
$35,475
98%
David L. Bridges (R)
2002
5
Incumbent
$37,600
97%
Carolyn Wright (R)
1998
5
Incumbent
$35,800
97%
Dori Contreras Garza (D)
2002
13
Open
$266,072
96%
Linda Reyna Yanez (D)
1998
13
Incumbent
$64,760
95%
Kerry P. Fitzgerald (R)
2000
5
Open
$36,645
95%
Michael J. O'Neill (R)
1998
5
Open
$89,865
95%
William G. 'Bud' Arnot (D)
2000
11
Incumbent
$12,125
91%
Carolyn Wright (R)
1996
5
Incumbent
$32,500
91%
Charles W. Seymore (R)
2000
14
Challenger
$104,060
90%
Scott Brister (R)
2000
1
Open
$243,708
90%
Richard Barajas (D)
2002
8
Incumbent
$31,133
90%

 
 
Least Lawyer-Dependent Justices
Justice
Election 
Year
Dist.
Running Status
Amount 
Raised
Share From 
Lawyers
Timothy G.Taft (R)
2000
1
Incumbent
$5,222
0%
James T. Worthen (R)
1998
12
Challenger
$114,846
3%
David Puryear (R)
2000
3
Challenger
$87,467
9%
Dixon W. Holman (R)
1996
2
Incumbent
$5,500
9%
Dixon W. Holman (R)
2002
2
Incumbent
$3,000
17%
Terry McCall (R)
1998
11
Open
$75,976
22%
Josh R. Morriss (R)
2002
6
Incumbent
$101,491
25%
Rex D. Davis (R)
1996
10
Incumbent
$82,882
31%
Errlinda Castillo (D)
2000
13
Open
$2,400
38%
Sandee Bryan Marion (R)
2002
4
Incumbent
$88,141
38%
Rex D. Davis (R)
2000
10
Incumbent
$79,800
42%
Thomas W. Gray (R)
1998
10
Open
$93,939
42%
David B. Gaultney (R)
2000
9
Open
$198,050
43%
Karen A. Angelini (R)
1998
4
Incumbent
$157,255
45%
Samuel M. Nuchia (R)
1996
1
Open
$76,921
47%
Terrie Livingston (R)
1996
2
Incumbent
$41,215
47%

At the other end of the spectrum, attorneys supplied less than half of the money raised by justices in 16 winning campaigns, including none of the modest war chest of Houston Justice Timothy Taft, whose wife supplied one-third of his money. Just two justices who raised more than $100,000 obtained 25 percent or less from attorneys: Tyler Justice James Worthen (who self-financed 85 percent of his 1998 war chest) and Texarkana Justice Josh Morriss.

Contributions to the justices from the legal profession are concentrated. The top 50 firms supplied more than $1.7 million (see accompanying table), which accounts for 26 percent of all the money analyzed in this study and 36 percent of all attorney money. Led by $172,356 from Vinson & Elkins’ PAC and attorneys, the top three sources of attorney cash were Houston-based corporate defense firms. Dallas-based plaintiff firm Baron & Budd ranked No. 4, with $77,018. The justices receive a steady stream of cases from the major defense and plaintiff firms that bankroll their election campaigns.
 

Top Law Firm Donors
Law Firm (PAC and Attorney donations)
Amount
Texas Base  *Favorite Judge(s)
Vinson & ElkinsD
$172,356
Houston Scott Brister
Fulbright & JaworskiD
$97,580
Houston Scott Brister
Baker & BottsD
$88,462
Houston Scott Brister
Baron & BuddP
$77,018
Dallas James A. Moseley
Haynes & BooneD
$70,050
Dallas Fitzgerald/James
Locke Liddell & SappD
$60,275
Dallas Kem Thompson Frost
Michael J. Garza & Dori Contreras GarzaP
$50,100
McAllen Dori Contreras Garza
Andrews & Kurth Mayer Day Caldwell…D
$46,650
Houston Scott Brister
Perry HaasP
$45,000
Corpus Dori Contreras Garza
Edwards Law FirmP
$43,250
Corpus Dori Contreras Garza
Gardere Wynne Sewell & RiggsD
$42,900
Dallas Martin E. Richter
Soules & WallaceD
$42,900
San Antonio Catherine M. Stone
MehaffyWeberD
$39,658
Beaumont David B. Gaultney
Winstead Sechrest & MinickD
$38,700
Dallas Kem Thompson Frost
Jackson WalkerD
$37,150
Dallas Scott Brister
Constant & VelaP
$37,000
Corpus Garza/Rodriguez/Valdez
Thompson & KnightD
$36,180
Dallas James A. Moseley
Hughes & LuceD
$33,943
Dallas Jan P. Patterson
Bracewell & PattersonD
$31,949
Houston Scott Brister
Jenkens & GilchristD
$31,515
Dallas Anne L. Gardner
Law Offices of Pat MaloneyP
$31,500
San Antonio Alma L. Lopez
Watts Law FirmP
$30,206
Corpus Frederico Hinojosa Jr.
Dawson & Sodd
$27,500
Corsicana Thomas W. Gray
O'Quinn Laminack & PirtleP
$25,950
Houston Sarah B. Duncan
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & FeldD
$25,220
Dallas Catherine M. Stone
Strasburger & PriceD
$24,475
Dallas Kem Thompson Frost
Susman GodfreyD
$24,000
Houston Kem Thompson Frost
Cantey & Hanger Roan & AutreyD
$23,625
Fort Worth Lee Ann Dauphinot
McDonald Clay Crow & McGartlandP
$23,489
Dallas Lee Ann Dauphinot
Gibbs & BrunsD
$23,000
Houston Scott Brister
Maloney & MaloneyP
$22,750
San Antonio Alma L. Lopez
Kelly Hart & HallmanD
$21,775
Fort Worth Anne L. Gardner
Huerta & AllisonP
$21,700
Corpus Alma L. Lopez
Lyons & RhodesP
$21,500
San Antonio Alma L. Lopez
Phil Watkins, PCP
$21,350
San Antonio Catherine M. Stone
Howie & SweeneyP
$21,180
Dallas Donnie R. Burgess
Wyatt Law FirmP
$21,000
Corpus Alma L. Lopez
Jose Henry Brantley & KeltnerP
$20,500
Fort Worth Dauphinot/Walker
Shannon Gracey Ratliff & MillerD
$19,881
Fort Worth Anne L. Gardner
Orgain Bell & TuckerD
$17,925
Beaumont Donnie R. Burgess
Fleming & AssociatesP
$17,750
Houston Scott Brister
Person Whitworth Ramos Borchers…D
$17,600
Laredo Alma L. Lopez
McKool Smith
$17,500
Dallas Lee Ann Dauphinot
Reaud Morgan & QuinnP
$17,500
Beaumont Donnie R. Burgess
Beirne Maynard & ParsonsD
$17,250
Houston Alcala/Brister/Frost
Mithoff & JacksP
$17,058
Houston Jan P. Patterson
Provost & UmphreyP
$16,600
Beaumont Donnie R. Burgess
William J. Tinning, PCP
$16,500
Portland Rodriguez/Valdez
Hall & BatesP
$16,000
San Antonio Alma L. Lopez
Law Office of Ramon GarciaP
$16,000
Edinburg Hinojosa/Valdez
TOTAL:
$1,760,920
   
D = Defense Firm; P = Plaintiff Firm.
*"Favorite Judge(s)" is calculated per election cycle (to account for justices who ran twice).

 
 
 
C. Contributions By Other Economic Interests
Interest  Contributions     Percent 
    of Total 
Agriculture
$46,290
1%
Communications
$23,455
0%
Construction
$114,977
2%
Electronics
$10,355
0%
Energy & Natural Resources
$206,586
3%
Finance
$226,766
3%
Health
$179,757
3%
Ideological
$106,705
2%
Insurance
$43,015
1%
Labor
$17,250
0%
Lawyers & Lobbyists
$4,912,270
72%
Miscellaneous Business
$122,244
2%
Other
$467,507
7%
Real Estate
$77,860
1%
Transportation
$66,017
1%
Unknown
$201,208
3%
TOTALS:
$6,824,458
100%
After Lawyers & Lobbyists, the next-largest group of donors—accounting for 7 percent of all the money—is the “Other” category, dominated by civil servants and public officials. Thirty-seven percent of this sector’s money comes from: Judicial candidates themselves; Transfers between two PACs of the same judicial candidate; or Donations from the PACs of other politicians. The largest self donors were Justice James Worthen ($97,778) and Justice Terry McCall ($22,153).

The next-largest sector, “Finance,” supplied $226,766, or just 3 percent of the total money raised.
 
 





D. Top Non-Lawyer Donors
Texas’ intermediate appeals court justices rely on lawyers and law firms for most of their campaign money, filling a comparatively modest 28 percent of their campaign coffers ($1,922,545) from other sources. This is hardly surprising, given that few non-lawyers know the names of these justices—much less their records. This leaves a small core of commercial interests that give heavily to these judicial campaigns. Most of these big donors have been parties to state court cases.

The top tier of these non-lawyer donors is dominated by PACs and employees of major sources of state political money that have direct interests in the legal decisions of state courts. These big donors include Fort Worth’s oil-rich Bass family, the Texas Medical Association, Houston homebuilder Bob Perry and Texans for Lawsuit Reform. The second tier of these donors, however, includes some lesser-known, regional commercial interests that do not rank as Texas political king makers, such as Beaumont construction firm Conex International and McAllen beer distributor L & F Distributors. Not surprisingly, many second-tier donors appear to have gotten involved in appeals court campaigns as a result of litigation that landed them in these courts.
 

Top Non-Lawyer Donors
Source (PACs and Employees)
Amount
  Location  *Favorite Judge(s)
Bass family (diversified oil fortune)
$59,500
  Fort Worth Anne L. Gardner
Texas Medical Association
$26,434
  Austin David B. Gaultney
Perry Homes
$24,750
  Houston Brister/Jennings
Texans for Lawsuit Reform
$19,500
  Houston David B. Gaultney
Associated Republicans of Texas
$17,335
  Austin David Puryear
International Bank of Commerce
$17,227
  Laredo Alma L. Lopez
Conex Internat'l (gen'l contractors)
$17,000
  Beaumont Donnie Burgess
L & F Distributors (beer distributor)
$13,500
  McAllen Hinojosa/Lopez
Reliant Energy
$12,905
  Houston Scott Brister
Duncan Truck (dealership)
$10,500
  Waco Sarah B. Duncan
Tepito Electronics (appliances)
$10,000
  Laredo Alma L. Lopez
FirstCity Financial Corp.
$9,750
  Waco Thomas W. Gray
Truman Arnold Co's (wholesale gas)
$9,700
  Texarkana Josh R. Morriss
BexarPAC (doctors)
$9,000
  San Antonio Karen A. Angelini
Jani-King (janitorial franchiser)
$8,100
  Addison James A. Moseley
TETCO, Inc. (wholesale gas)
$8,000
  San Antonio Lopez/Stone
Texan Land/Taub Investments
$7,925
  Houston Samuel M. Nuchia
Laredo National Bank
$7,100
  Laredo Alma L. Lopez
SBC Corp. (Southwestern Bell)
$7,028
  San Antonio Paul W. Green
Texas Automobile Dealers Assoc.
$7,000
  Austin Jan P. Patterson
Offenhauser & Co. (insurance agent)
$6,652
  Texarkana Josh R. Morriss
Flournoy Exploration (oil & gas)
$6,500
  Alice Alma L. Lopez
Killam Oil Co. (oil & gas)
$6,450
  Laredo Alma L. Lopez
Beaumont Bone & Joint
$6,300
  Beaumont David B. Gaultney
Chiles Survivors Trust (oil fortune)
$6,250
  Fort Worth Lee Ann Dauphinot
H.B. Zachry Co.(gen'l contractors)
$6,212
  San Antonio Paul W. Green
†TX Bipartisan Justice Com.
$6,133
  Longview Kenneth Mack Kidd
TOTAL:
$346,751
     
†Medical, engineering and other business tort interests.
*"Favorite Judge(s)" is calculated per election cycle (to account for justices who ran twice).
Of Special Interest 
Bell’s Direct Line
Southwestern Bell v. Virginia Pawlik
Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio

Southwestern Bell employee Virginia Pawlik accused her employer of negligently investigating her complaint that her ex-boyfriend—another Southwestern Bell employee—illicitly wiretapped her phone. A jury awarded Pawlik a $495,000 judgment in actual and exemplary damages.

Ruling that there was no evidence that SBC Corp.’s Southwestern Bell failed to reasonably investigate Pawlik’s complaint, three Fourth Court of Appeals justices reversed the trial court’s judgment in 1998 to rule in Bell’s favor. One of these justices, Paul Green, tapped SBC executives and lawyers for $1,550 for his 2000 campaign. The top SBC donor, SBC Communications General Counsel James Ellis, gave him $1,000.
 

Amador Cruz’s Spring Break
L & F Distributor v. Amador G. Cruz
Thirteenth Court of Appeals, Corpus Christi

Spring break was no party for Amador Cruz. The beer warehouse where he worked forced him to work long weekend hours to keep college kids lubed on Padre Island. When he complained about forced overtime, L & F Distributors fired him. Cruz filed suit, seeking overtime pay and damages for retalitory discrimination. A jury ruled in Cruz’s favor on both points, but the trial judge rendered a take-nothing judgment on the overtime award.

Thirteenth Court of Appeals justices reversed the trial court in December 1996, vacating the retaliation judgment but reinstating Cruz’s overtime award. Justice Federico Hinojosa’s dissenting opinion would have rendered a take-nothing judgment on both of Cruz’s claims. Three years later, L & F President Joe La Mantia poured $5,000 into Justice Hinojosa’s campaign.
 

Conex’s Winning Hand
Conex International Corp. v. James R. Cox
Ninth Court of Appeals, Beaumont

Worker James Cox said that Beaumont construction company Conex International retaliated against him by firing him after he filed for workers’ compensation for an on-the-job hand injury. Conex appealed a jury’s award of $48,200 for Cox’s injuries. Ninth District Court of Appeals justices reversed the trial court in June 2000, ordering Cox to go away empty handed.

Conex executives contributed $17,000 to winning Ninth District candidates from 1998 through 2000, including $15,000 to Justice Don Burgess. Justice Burgess' concurring opinion in the case lamented that Texas law precludes workers from recovering damages once they accept workers’ compensation benefits.
 

 
 



8 This report analyzes donations of $100 or more when candidates did not file electronically.


Copyright © 2003 Texans for Public Justice